EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT SUTURE MATERIALS ON TISSUE HEALING

Fırat Selvi, Sırmahan Çakarer, Taylan Can, Serpil İrem Kırlı Topçu, Alen Palancıoğlu, Başak Keskin, Bilge Bilgiç, Mehmet Yaltırık, Cengizhan Keskin
599 136

Abstract


Purpose:The purpose of this study was to investigate the healing differences in between four different widely used suture materials in the oral surgery practice, including silk (Perma-Hand; Ethicon, INC., Somerville, NJ, USA), polypropylene (Prolene; Ethicon, INC., Somerville, NJ, USA), coated polyglactin 910 (Ethicon, INC., Somerville, NJ, USA). and polyglecaprone 25 (Ethicon, INC., Somerville, NJ, USA ).

Materials and Methods: 20 male rats were randomly allocated into two groups depending on their sacrification days (post-operative 1st and the 7th days). Four longitudinal incision wounds, each 1cm in size, were created on the dorsum of each animal which were then primarily closed with four different types of sutures.

Results: The effects of these suture materials on soft tissue healing were compared histopathologically, by means of density of the cells, necrosis, fibrosis, foreign body reaction, the presence of cells of acute and chronic infection. No statistically significant difference was observed between the groups regarding the density of the cells, necrosis, fibrosis, foreign body reaction, and the presence of the cells of acute & chronic infections. Of note, propylene showed slightly less tissue reaction among the other materials.

Conclusion: The results of our study showed that there is no only one ideal suture material for surgical practice. The factors related to the patient, the type of the surgery and the quality of the tissue are important to decide an appropriate suture material.


Keywords


Suture material; soft tissue; surgery; dorsum; rat

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.79438

References


Yilmaz N, Inal S, Muglali M, Güvenç T, Baş B. Effects of polyglecaprone 25, silk and catgut suture materials on oral mucosa wound healing in diabetic rats: an evaluation of nitric oxide dynamics. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010;15(3):526-530.

Pons-Vicente O, López-Jiménez L, Sánchez-Garcés MA, Sala-Pérez S, Gay-Escoda C. A comparative study between two different suture materials in oral implantology. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22(3):282-288

Minozzi F, Bollero P, Unfer V, Dolci A, Galli M. The sutures in dentistry. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2009;13:3:217-226.

Moy RL, Waldman B, Hein DW. A review of sutures and suturing techniques. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1992,18:(9)785-795.

Omovie E.E, Shepherd J.P. Assessment of repair of facial lacerations. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;35.(4)237-240.

Van Heerden J. Comparison of inflammatory response to polyglytone 6211 and polyglecaprone 25 in a rat model. S Afr Med J; 2005,95,972-974.

Baqain ZH, Moqbel WY, Sawair FA. Early dental implant failure: risk factors. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;50(3):239-43.

Yaltirik M, Dedeoglu K, Bilgic B, Koray M, Ersev H, Issever H, Dulger O, Soley S Comparison of four different suture materials in soft tissues of rats. Oral Dis 2003;9;6:284-286.

Masini BD, Stinner DJ, Waterman SM, Wenke JC. Bacterial adherence to suture materials. J Surg Educ 2011;68:(2)101-104.

Isler SC, Demircan S, Cakarer S, Cebi Z, Keskin C, Soluk M, Yuzbasioglu E. Effects of folk medicinal plant extract Ankaferd Blood Stopper on early bone healing. Journal of Applied Oral Science 2010,18:(4):409-414.

Lilly GE, Cutcher JL, Jones JC, et al. Reaction of oral tissues to suture materials. IV Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972;(33):1,152-157.

Kim JS, Shin SI, Herr Y, Park JB, Kwon YH, Chung JH. Tissue reactions to suture materials in the oral mucosa of beagle dogs. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2011;41(4),185-191.

Sortino F, Lombardo C, Sciacca A. Silk and polyglycolic acid in oral surgery: a comparative study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105:(3)15-18.

Otten JE, Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad M, Jahnke H, Pelz K. Bacterial colonization on different suture materials-a potential risk for intraoral dentoalveolar surgery. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005;74:(1):627-635.

Banche G, Roana J, Mandras N, Amasio M, Gallesio C, Allizond V, Angeretti A, Tullio V, Cuffini AM. Microbial adherence on various intraoral suture materials in patients undergoing dental surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:(8)1503-1507.

Muglali M, Yilmaz N, Inal S, Guvenc T. Immunohistochemical comparison of indermil with traditional suture materials in dental surgery J Craniofac Sur 2011;22(5):1875-1879.

McCaul LK, Bagg J, Jenkins W.M.M. Rate of loss of irradiated polyglactin 910 (Vicryl Rapide) from the mouth: a prospective study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000,38(4):328-330.

Yedke SR, Raut SY, Jangde CR. Experimental evaluation of horse hair as a nonabsorbable monofilament suture. J Ayurveda Integr Med 2013;4(4):206-210.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.